Sleep Medicine Clinics

907 papers and 15.9k indexed citations i.

About

The 907 papers published in Sleep Medicine Clinics in the last decades have received a total of 15.9k indexed citations. Papers published in Sleep Medicine Clinics usually cover Cognitive Neuroscience (467 papers), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (458 papers) and Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (456 papers) specifically the topics of Sleep and Wakefulness Research (463 papers), Sleep and related disorders (439 papers) and Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research (358 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Sleep Medicine Clinics are Michael A. Grandner, Michael V. Vitiello, Jeanne F. Duffy, Torbjörn Åkerstedt, Charles M. Morin, Kenneth P. Wright, Thomas A. Mellman, Denise C. Jarrin, Avi Sadeh and Meir H. Kryger.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Sleep Medicine Clinics

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Sleep Medicine Clinics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Sleep Medicine Clinics.

Countries where authors publish in Sleep Medicine Clinics

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Sleep Medicine Clinics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Sleep Medicine Clinics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sleep Medicine Clinics more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025