SIMULATION

3.3k papers and 30.3k indexed citations

About

The 3.3k papers published in SIMULATION in the last decades have received a total of 30.3k indexed citations. Papers published in SIMULATION usually cover Management Science and Operations Research (788 papers), Control and Systems Engineering (533 papers) and Computer Networks and Communications (498 papers) specifically the topics of Simulation Techniques and Applications (676 papers), Distributed and Parallel Computing Systems (177 papers) and Business Process Modeling and Analysis (134 papers). The most active scholars publishing in SIMULATION are Zong Woo Geem, Joong Hoon Kim, G. V. Loganathan, Bernard P. Zeigler, Paul A. Fishwick, Robert M. O’Keefe, Ernesto Kofman, Ivan E. Sutherland, Jay W. Forrester and Abdollah Homaifar.

In The Last Decade

SIMULATION

2.5k papers receiving 26.8k citations

Fields of papers published in SIMULATION

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in SIMULATION. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in SIMULATION.

Countries where authors publish in SIMULATION

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in SIMULATION. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in SIMULATION with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites SIMULATION more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026