This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Sensor Letters. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Sensor Letters with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sensor Letters more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Sensor Letters. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Sensor Letters.
About Sensor Letters
The 2.4k papers published in Sensor Letters in the last decades have received a total of 16.1k indexed citations . Papers published in Sensor Letters usually cover Bioengineering (544 papers), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (1.1k papers), Electrochemistry (117 papers), Polymers and Plastics (190 papers) and Biomedical Engineering (557 papers) specifically the topics of Analytical Chemistry and Sensors (544 papers), Gas Sensing Nanomaterials and Sensors (433 papers), Electrochemical sensors and biosensors (318 papers), Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies (291 papers), Conducting polymers and applications (144 papers), Electrochemical Analysis and Applications (117 papers), Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques (116 papers) and Sensor Technology and Measurement Systems (88 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Sensor Letters are Zhi Chen, Chi Lu, Gwo‐Bin Lee, Chia‐Yen Lee, Ahmed Hashim, Aseel Hadi, Mohammad Reza Ganjali, Craig A. Grimes, Hassan Ali Zamani and Majeed Ali Habeeb.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.