Seminars in Nuclear Medicine

2.0k papers and 56.8k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.0k papers published in Seminars in Nuclear Medicine in the last decades have received a total of 56.8k indexed citations. Papers published in Seminars in Nuclear Medicine usually cover Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (1.0k papers), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (568 papers) and Surgery (460 papers) specifically the topics of Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications (560 papers), Radiopharmaceutical Chemistry and Applications (346 papers) and Medical Imaging and Pathology Studies (183 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Seminars in Nuclear Medicine are Charles E. Metz, Abass Alavi, Ignac Fogelman, Christopher J. Palestro, Gary Cook, Stanley J. Goldsmith, Hongming Zhuang, Shankar Vallabhajosula, Simon R. Cherry and William H. Beierwaltes.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Seminars in Nuclear Medicine

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Seminars in Nuclear Medicine. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Seminars in Nuclear Medicine.

Countries where authors publish in Seminars in Nuclear Medicine

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Seminars in Nuclear Medicine. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Seminars in Nuclear Medicine with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Seminars in Nuclear Medicine more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025