Countries where authors publish in Spirituality in Clinical Practice
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Spirituality in Clinical Practice. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Spirituality in Clinical Practice with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Spirituality in Clinical Practice more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Spirituality in Clinical Practice
This network shows the impact of papers published in Spirituality in Clinical Practice. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Spirituality in Clinical Practice.
About Spirituality in Clinical Practice
The 319 papers published in Spirituality in Clinical Practice in the last decades have received a total of 2.8k indexed citations . Papers published in Spirituality in Clinical Practice usually cover Health (212 papers), Clinical Psychology (155 papers), Social Psychology (99 papers), Applied Psychology (19 papers) and Religious studies (6 papers) specifically the topics of Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (208 papers), Resilience and Mental Health (53 papers), Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health (36 papers), Counseling Practices and Supervision (25 papers), Education and Islamic Studies (21 papers), Health and Well-being Studies (21 papers), Paranormal Experiences and Beliefs (20 papers) and Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions (18 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Spirituality in Clinical Practice are Kenneth I. Pargäment, Thomas G. Plante, Holly K. Oxhandler, Len Sperry, Joseph P. Gone, Joseph M. Currier, Jeanette Irene Harris, Robert D. Enright, Cassandra Vieten and Daniel Gutiérrez.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.