Spirituality in Clinical Practice

282 papers and 1.9k indexed citations i.

About

The 282 papers published in Spirituality in Clinical Practice in the last decades have received a total of 1.9k indexed citations. Papers published in Spirituality in Clinical Practice usually cover Health (199 papers), Clinical Psychology (148 papers) and Social Psychology (94 papers) specifically the topics of Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (195 papers), Resilience and Mental Health (48 papers) and Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health (35 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Spirituality in Clinical Practice are Kenneth I. Pargäment, Joseph P. Gone, Thomas G. Plante, Joseph M. Currier, Holly K. Oxhandler, J. Irene Harris, Len Sperry, Robert D. Enright, Daniel Gutiérrez and Craig J. Bryan.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Spirituality in Clinical Practice

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Spirituality in Clinical Practice. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Spirituality in Clinical Practice.

Countries where authors publish in Spirituality in Clinical Practice

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Spirituality in Clinical Practice. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Spirituality in Clinical Practice with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Spirituality in Clinical Practice more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025