Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia

1.6k papers and 13.0k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.6k papers published in Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia in the last decades have received a total of 13.0k indexed citations. Papers published in Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia usually cover Surgery (836 papers), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (606 papers) and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (345 papers) specifically the topics of Anesthesia and Pain Management (490 papers), Airway Management and Intubation Techniques (297 papers) and Anesthesia and Sedative Agents (267 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia are Sarah Cuschieri, Abdullah Sulieman Terkawi, Siny Tsang, Colin Royse, Hunny Sharma, Osama A. Samarkandi, Preet Mohinder Singh, Jasbir Kaur, Milind S. Tullu and Abhijit Nair.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia.

Countries where authors publish in Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025