Countries where authors publish in Scottish Affairs
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Scottish Affairs. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Scottish Affairs with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Scottish Affairs more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Scottish Affairs. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Scottish Affairs.
About Scottish Affairs
The 740 papers published in Scottish Affairs in the last decades have received a total of 2.7k indexed citations . Papers published in Scottish Affairs usually cover History (250 papers), Political Science and International Relations (321 papers), Sociology and Political Science (292 papers), Gender Studies (55 papers) and Urban Studies (29 papers) specifically the topics of Scottish History and National Identity (242 papers), Political Systems and Governance (200 papers), Irish and British Studies (176 papers), Social Policy and Reform Studies (61 papers), Historical Studies of British Isles (56 papers), Gender Politics and Representation (32 papers), Migration, Refugees, and Integration (27 papers) and Political and Economic history of UK and US (27 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Scottish Affairs are David McCrone, Luis Moreno, Lindsay Paterson, Ross Bond, David Denver, Michael Keating, M. G. Lloyd, John MacInnes, Michael Rosie and Arthur Midwinter.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.