Regional Science Policy & Practice

7.5k citations
864 papers · · active since 2016

Impact in

    • Regional Economics and Spatial Analysis
    • Regional resilience and development
    • Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth
    • Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
    • COVID-19 Pandemic Impacts
    • Economic Growth and Productivity

Papers in

    • Regional Economics and Spatial Analysis 183
    • Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth 116
    • Regional resilience and development 92
    • Economic Growth and Productivity 64
    • Spatial and Panel Data Analysis 51

Regional Science Policy & Practice

772 papers receiving 6.9k citations

Peers

Regional Science Policy & Practice
Comparison fields: 5 of 168
  • Economics and Econometrics 3.2k
  • Urban Studies 665
  • Transportation 662
  • General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 541
  • Modeling and Simulation 303
Replace Policy and Society with:
Policy and Society Canada
China Agricultural Economic Review China
Dialogues in Human Geography United Kingdom
Monthly labor review United States
Feminist Economics United States
Revista de Administração Pública Brazil
Fiscal Studies United Kingdom
Eurasian Geography and Economics United States
Climate and Development United States
Environment and Development Economics United States
Regional Science Policy & Practice relative to Policy and Society Canada Policy and Society's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Policy and Society · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Regional Science Policy & Practice

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Regional Science Policy & Practice. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Regional Science Policy & Practice with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Regional Science Policy & Practice more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Regional Science Policy & Practice

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Regional Science Policy & Practice. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Regional Science Policy & Practice.

About Regional Science Policy & Practice

The 864 papers published in Regional Science Policy & Practice in the last decades have received a total of 7.5k indexed citations . Papers published in Regional Science Policy & Practice usually cover Urban Studies (113 papers), Economics and Econometrics (466 papers), Transportation (73 papers), General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (82 papers) and Political Science and International Relations (209 papers) specifically the topics of Regional Economics and Spatial Analysis (183 papers), Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth (116 papers), Regional Development and Policy (114 papers), Regional resilience and development (92 papers), Economic Growth and Productivity (64 papers), Urban Transport and Accessibility (61 papers), Spatial and Panel Data Analysis (51 papers) and Global trade and economics (41 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Regional Science Policy & Practice are Andrés Rodríguez‐Pose, Amitrajeet A. Batabyal, Henry Wai‐chung Yeung, Roberta Capello, S. Niggol Seo, Gordon F. Mulligan, Philip Cooke, Nikos Kapitsinis, Karima Kourtit and Peter J. Nijkamp.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact