Regional Science Policy & Practice

767 papers and 5.0k indexed citations i.

About

The 767 papers published in Regional Science Policy & Practice in the last decades have received a total of 5.0k indexed citations. Papers published in Regional Science Policy & Practice usually cover Economics and Econometrics (439 papers), Political Science and International Relations (190 papers) and Sociology and Political Science (165 papers) specifically the topics of Regional Economics and Spatial Analysis (177 papers), Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth (113 papers) and Regional Development and Policy (106 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Regional Science Policy & Practice are Andrés Rodríguez‐Pose, Henry Wai‐chung Yeung, Amitrajeet A. Batabyal, Roberta Capello, Philip Cooke, S. Niggol Seo, Nikolaos Kapitsinis, Gordon F. Mulligan, Karima Kourtit and Ron Martin.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Regional Science Policy & Practice

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Regional Science Policy & Practice. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Regional Science Policy & Practice.

Countries where authors publish in Regional Science Policy & Practice

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Regional Science Policy & Practice. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Regional Science Policy & Practice with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Regional Science Policy & Practice more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025