Anuario de Historia de la Iglesia

500 papers and 280 indexed citations i.

About

The 500 papers published in Anuario de Historia de la Iglesia in the last decades have received a total of 280 indexed citations. Papers published in Anuario de Historia de la Iglesia usually cover History (217 papers), Sociology and Political Science (166 papers) and Demography (92 papers) specifically the topics of Religious and Theological Studies (117 papers), Historical Studies in Latin America (87 papers) and Libraries, Manuscripts, and Books (76 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Anuario de Historia de la Iglesia are James W. Brodman, Roberto Di Stéfano, M Juan, Antonio Irigoyen López, Fernando Moreno, Giulia Sfameni Gasparro, Ilaria Ramelli, Magnus Lundberg, Maurício Beuchot and Eugenio Villar.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Anuario de Historia de la Iglesia

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Anuario de Historia de la Iglesia. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Anuario de Historia de la Iglesia.

Countries where authors publish in Anuario de Historia de la Iglesia

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Anuario de Historia de la Iglesia. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Anuario de Historia de la Iglesia with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anuario de Historia de la Iglesia more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025