Countries where authors publish in Radiation Oncology Journal
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Radiation Oncology Journal. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Radiation Oncology Journal with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Radiation Oncology Journal more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Radiation Oncology Journal
This network shows the impact of papers published in Radiation Oncology Journal. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Radiation Oncology Journal.
About Radiation Oncology Journal
The 626 papers published in Radiation Oncology Journal in the last decades have received a total of 6.8k indexed citations . Papers published in Radiation Oncology Journal usually cover Otorhinolaryngology (59 papers), Radiation (83 papers), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (147 papers), Obstetrics and Gynecology (31 papers) and Hepatology (31 papers) specifically the topics of Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques (82 papers), Head and Neck Cancer Studies (59 papers), Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (42 papers), Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (37 papers), Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis (31 papers), Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments (31 papers), Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (29 papers) and Effects of Radiation Exposure (27 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Radiation Oncology Journal are Itzhak Brook, Byungchul Cho, Jae Ho Kim, Kenneth A. Jenrow, Stephen L. Brown, Renu Madan, Chinna Babu Dracham, Seung Jae Huh, Yeon‐Sil Kim and Seungjong Oh.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.