Revue de littérature comparée

216 papers and 125 indexed citations i.

About

The 216 papers published in Revue de littérature comparée in the last decades have received a total of 125 indexed citations. Papers published in Revue de littérature comparée usually cover Literature and Literary Theory (75 papers), Anthropology (65 papers) and Sociology and Political Science (32 papers) specifically the topics of Historical and Literary Analyses (41 papers), Historical and Literary Studies (40 papers) and Discourse Analysis and Argumentation Studies (27 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Revue de littérature comparée are Samuel Weber, Philippe Lejeune, Pierre Brunel, Raymond Trousson, Peggy Kamuf, Jean‐Pierre Morel, Louis de Saussure, J. Prost, Rafaël Lucas and Hua Meng.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Revue de littérature comparée

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Revue de littérature comparée. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Revue de littérature comparée.

Countries where authors publish in Revue de littérature comparée

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Revue de littérature comparée. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Revue de littérature comparée with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Revue de littérature comparée more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025