Review of Financial Economics

13.2k citations
649 papers · · active since 1950

Impact in

  • Finance top 2%
    • Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
    • Banking stability, regulation, efficiency
    • Financial Risk and Volatility Modeling
  • Accounting top 2%
    • Corporate Finance and Governance
    • Islamic Finance and Banking Studies
    • Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance

Papers in

    • Financial Markets and Investment Strategies 265
    • Banking stability, regulation, efficiency 116
    • Financial Risk and Volatility Modeling 75
    • Corporate Finance and Governance 240
    • Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance 94

Review of Financial Economics

583 papers receiving 12.0k citations

Peers

Review of Financial Economics
Comparison fields: 5 of 130
  • Finance 7.1k
  • Accounting 6.1k
  • Economics and Econometrics 7.3k
  • General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2.2k
  • Strategy and Management 2.2k
Replace Journal of Multinational Financial Management with:
Journal of Multinational Financial Management United States
The Journal of Risk Finance United States
Borsa Istanbul Review Türkiye
Journal of the Japanese and International Economies Japan
International Review of Finance United States
The World Bank Research Observer United States
Global Finance Journal United States
Comparative Economic Studies United States
Fiscal Studies United Kingdom
Financial Innovation China
Review of Financial Economics relative to Journal of Multinational Financial Management United States Journal of Multinational Financial Management's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Journal of Multinational Financial Management · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Review of Financial Economics

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Review of Financial Economics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Review of Financial Economics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Review of Financial Economics more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Review of Financial Economics

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Review of Financial Economics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Review of Financial Economics.

About Review of Financial Economics

The 649 papers published in Review of Financial Economics in the last decades have received a total of 13.2k indexed citations . Papers published in Review of Financial Economics usually cover Finance (474 papers), Accounting (339 papers), General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (119 papers), Economics and Econometrics (329 papers) and General Decision Sciences (12 papers) specifically the topics of Financial Markets and Investment Strategies (265 papers), Corporate Finance and Governance (240 papers), Market Dynamics and Volatility (125 papers), Banking stability, regulation, efficiency (116 papers), Monetary Policy and Economic Impact (114 papers), Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance (94 papers), Housing Market and Economics (77 papers) and Financial Risk and Volatility Modeling (75 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Review of Financial Economics are Diane K. Denis, Yousif Khalifa Al‐Yousif, David A. Sauer, Rima Turk Ariss, Gregor Dorfleitner, Mahmoud Sami Nabi, Laarni T. Bulan, Κωνσταντίνος Δράκος, Farooq Malik and Matthew Hood.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact