Reviews on Environmental Health

958 papers and 22.1k indexed citations i.

About

The 958 papers published in Reviews on Environmental Health in the last decades have received a total of 22.1k indexed citations. Papers published in Reviews on Environmental Health usually cover Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (451 papers), Pollution (147 papers) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (92 papers) specifically the topics of Air Quality and Health Impacts (188 papers), Climate Change and Health Impacts (103 papers) and Heavy Metal Exposure and Toxicity (96 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Reviews on Environmental Health are David O. Carpenter, Paul B. Tchounwou, Virginia Buchner, Dieter Schwela, Michael C.R. Alavanja, Emmanuel Obeng-Gyasi, T. A. B. Sanders, Ying Liu, Doug Brugge and Rolf U. Halden.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Reviews on Environmental Health

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Reviews on Environmental Health. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Reviews on Environmental Health.

Countries where authors publish in Reviews on Environmental Health

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Reviews on Environmental Health. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Reviews on Environmental Health with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Reviews on Environmental Health more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025