Radiation Oncology Investigations

309 papers and 3.7k indexed citations i.

About

The 309 papers published in Radiation Oncology Investigations in the last decades have received a total of 3.7k indexed citations. Papers published in Radiation Oncology Investigations usually cover Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (101 papers), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (89 papers) and Oncology (88 papers) specifically the topics of Effects of Radiation Exposure (58 papers), Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques (52 papers) and DNA Repair Mechanisms (37 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Radiation Oncology Investigations are Colin Seymour, Carmel Mothersill, Rupert Schmidt‐Ullrich, Nelson N. Stone, Richard G. Stock, Bruce G. Haffty, John H. Suh, T. P. O’Dwyer, Benjamin D. Smith and David E. Wazer.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Radiation Oncology Investigations

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Radiation Oncology Investigations. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Radiation Oncology Investigations.

Countries where authors publish in Radiation Oncology Investigations

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Radiation Oncology Investigations. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Radiation Oncology Investigations with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Radiation Oncology Investigations more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025