Forstwissenschaftliches Centralblatt

1.3k papers and 9.7k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.3k papers published in Forstwissenschaftliches Centralblatt in the last decades have received a total of 9.7k indexed citations. Papers published in Forstwissenschaftliches Centralblatt usually cover Plant Science (460 papers), Nature and Landscape Conservation (362 papers) and Insect Science (284 papers) specifically the topics of Botany and Plant Ecology Studies (318 papers), Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies (266 papers) and Forest ecology and management (201 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Forstwissenschaftliches Centralblatt are K. E. Rehfuess, J. Bauch, K. Kreutzer, Dieter Eckstein, B. Ulrich, E. Aßmann, H. W. Zöttl, U. Ammer, Peter Schütt and J. B. Larsen.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Forstwissenschaftliches Centralblatt

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Forstwissenschaftliches Centralblatt. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Forstwissenschaftliches Centralblatt.

Countries where authors publish in Forstwissenschaftliches Centralblatt

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Forstwissenschaftliches Centralblatt. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Forstwissenschaftliches Centralblatt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Forstwissenschaftliches Centralblatt more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025