This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Quaternaire. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Quaternaire with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Quaternaire more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Quaternaire. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Quaternaire.
About Quaternaire
The 851 papers published in Quaternaire in the last decades have received a total of 8.5k indexed citations . Papers published in Quaternaire usually cover Earth-Surface Processes (217 papers), Anthropology (261 papers), Atmospheric Science (443 papers), Paleontology (171 papers) and Archeology (131 papers) specifically the topics of Geology and Paleoclimatology Research (440 papers), Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology (259 papers), Geological formations and processes (131 papers), Geological and Geophysical Studies Worldwide (117 papers), Evolution and Paleontology Studies (87 papers), Aeolian processes and effects (78 papers), Archaeology and ancient environmental studies (67 papers) and Maritime and Coastal Archaeology (47 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Quaternaire are Nicole Limondin‐Lozouet, Pierre Antoine, Patrick Auguste, Jean‐Jacques Bahain, Christophe Falguères, Denis Geraads, Évelyne Crégut-Bonnoure, Jean Chaline, Philip L. Gibbard and Emmanuel Desclaux.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.