Quantum Machine Intelligence

2.3k citations
269 papers · · active since 1953

Impact in

Papers in

    • Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture 207
    • Quantum Information and Cryptography 145
    • Neural Networks and Reservoir Computing 44
    • Neural Networks and Applications 26
    • Stochastic Gradient Optimization Techniques 11

Quantum Machine Intelligence

215 papers receiving 2.2k citations

Peers

Quantum Machine Intelligence
Comparison fields: 5 of 100
  • Artificial Intelligence 1.8k
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 361
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 404
  • Computational Mathematics 6
  • Biophysics 41
Replace IEEE Transactions on Quantum Engineering with:
IEEE Transactions on Quantum Engineering United States
Journal of Electronic Science and Technology China
EPJ Quantum Technology China
3D Research China
Johns Hopkins APL technical digest United States
Electronics & Communications Engineering Journal United Kingdom
IEEE Transactions on Electronics Packaging Manufacturing United States
International journal of unconventional computing United Kingdom
IEEE Solid-State Circuits Magazine United States
Integrating materials and manufacturing innovation United States
Quantum Machine Intelligence relative to IEEE Transactions on Quantum Engineering United States IEEE Transactions on Quantum Engineering's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.6×
IEEE Transactions on Quantum Engineering · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Quantum Machine Intelligence

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Quantum Machine Intelligence. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Quantum Machine Intelligence with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Quantum Machine Intelligence more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Quantum Machine Intelligence

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Quantum Machine Intelligence. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Quantum Machine Intelligence.

About Quantum Machine Intelligence

The 269 papers published in Quantum Machine Intelligence in the last decades have received a total of 2.3k indexed citations . Papers published in Quantum Machine Intelligence usually cover Artificial Intelligence (239 papers), Computational Mathematics (3 papers), Computational Theory and Mathematics (57 papers), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (51 papers) and Hardware and Architecture (8 papers) specifically the topics of Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture (207 papers), Quantum Information and Cryptography (145 papers), Neural Networks and Reservoir Computing (44 papers), Quantum-Dot Cellular Automata (30 papers), Quantum Mechanics and Applications (28 papers), Neural Networks and Applications (26 papers), Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms (16 papers) and Stochastic Gradient Optimization Techniques (11 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Quantum Machine Intelligence are Daniel K. Park, Tak Hur, Davide Venturelli, Masoud Mohseni, Andrea Skolik, Martin Leib, Jarrod R. McClean, Patrick van der Smagt, Giovanni Acampora and Haimeng Zhao.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact