Qualitative Sociology Review

457 papers and 2.4k indexed citations i.

About

The 457 papers published in Qualitative Sociology Review in the last decades have received a total of 2.4k indexed citations. Papers published in Qualitative Sociology Review usually cover Sociology and Political Science (248 papers), Gender Studies (62 papers) and General Health Professions (46 papers) specifically the topics of Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics (42 papers), Social and Cultural Dynamics (38 papers) and Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice (28 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Qualitative Sociology Review are Robert Prus, Suzanne Day, Kip Jones, Krzysztof T. Konecki, Stephanie Taylor, Karen Littleton, Niels Åkerstrøm Andersen, Leslie Irvine, Malin Åkerström and Constantinos N. Phellas.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Qualitative Sociology Review

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Qualitative Sociology Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Qualitative Sociology Review.

Countries where authors publish in Qualitative Sociology Review

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Qualitative Sociology Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Qualitative Sociology Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Qualitative Sociology Review more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025