Progress in Development Studies

543 papers and 9.8k indexed citations i.

About

The 543 papers published in Progress in Development Studies in the last decades have received a total of 9.8k indexed citations. Papers published in Progress in Development Studies usually cover Sociology and Political Science (237 papers), Political Science and International Relations (110 papers) and Economics and Econometrics (107 papers) specifically the topics of International Development and Aid (92 papers), Poverty, Education, and Child Welfare (64 papers) and Tourism, Volunteerism, and Development (56 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Progress in Development Studies are John A. G. Briggs, Claire Mercer, Roger Few, Katrina Brown, Saleemul Huq, W. Neil Adger, Mike Hulme, Declan Conway, Uma Kothari and Roger Levermore.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Progress in Development Studies

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Progress in Development Studies. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Progress in Development Studies.

Countries where authors publish in Progress in Development Studies

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Progress in Development Studies. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Progress in Development Studies with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Progress in Development Studies more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025