Prehospital and Disaster Medicine

3.6k papers and 34.8k indexed citations i.

About

The 3.6k papers published in Prehospital and Disaster Medicine in the last decades have received a total of 34.8k indexed citations. Papers published in Prehospital and Disaster Medicine usually cover Emergency Medical Services (1.8k papers), Emergency Medicine (1.3k papers) and Sociology and Political Science (552 papers) specifically the topics of Disaster Response and Management (1.8k papers), Trauma and Emergency Care Studies (744 papers) and Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation (657 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Prehospital and Disaster Medicine are Samuel J. Stratton, Eric K. Noji, Frederick M. Burkle, Paul Arbon, Brian Maguire, Marvin L. Birnbaum, Jeffrey L. Arnold, Wolfgang Dick, Andrew Milsten and Adam Lund.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Prehospital and Disaster Medicine

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Prehospital and Disaster Medicine. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Prehospital and Disaster Medicine.

Countries where authors publish in Prehospital and Disaster Medicine

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Prehospital and Disaster Medicine. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Prehospital and Disaster Medicine with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Prehospital and Disaster Medicine more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025