Plant Physiology Reports

372 papers and 1.9k indexed citations i.

About

The 372 papers published in Plant Physiology Reports in the last decades have received a total of 1.9k indexed citations. Papers published in Plant Physiology Reports usually cover Plant Science (343 papers), Molecular Biology (80 papers) and Agronomy and Crop Science (36 papers) specifically the topics of Plant Stress Responses and Tolerance (113 papers), Rice Cultivation and Yield Improvement (46 papers) and Plant Micronutrient Interactions and Effects (42 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Plant Physiology Reports are Kumari Sita, Vaneet Kumar, Renu Pandey, Muthappa Senthil‐Kumar, Krishnapriya Vengavasi, Vijay Paul, Rakesh Pandey, Malcolm J. Hawkesford, Inayatullah Tahir and Ralf Oelmüller.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Plant Physiology Reports

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Plant Physiology Reports. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Plant Physiology Reports.

Countries where authors publish in Plant Physiology Reports

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Plant Physiology Reports. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Plant Physiology Reports with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Plant Physiology Reports more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025