Portuguese Studies

198 papers and 273 indexed citations i.

About

The 198 papers published in Portuguese Studies in the last decades have received a total of 273 indexed citations. Papers published in Portuguese Studies usually cover Anthropology (52 papers), Sociology and Political Science (46 papers) and History (45 papers) specifically the topics of Literature, Culture, and Criticism (28 papers), African history and culture studies (23 papers) and History, Culture, and Society (19 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Portuguese Studies are Patrick Chabal, Charles W. Stewart, Malyn Newitt, Alexander Keese, Gervase Clarence‐Smith, António Costa Pinto, Kenneth Maxwell, Ricardo Roque, Richard Drayton and Alan Forey.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Portuguese Studies

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Portuguese Studies. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Portuguese Studies.

Countries where authors publish in Portuguese Studies

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Portuguese Studies. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Portuguese Studies with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Portuguese Studies more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025