Journal of Applied Mechanics and Technical Physics

28.1k citations
6.1k papers · · active since 2016

Impact in

Papers in

Journal of Applied Mechanics and Technical Physics

4.6k papers receiving 24.7k citations

Peers

Journal of Applied Mechanics and Technical Physics
Comparison fields: 5 of 173
  • Computational Mechanics 9.8k
  • Mechanics of Materials 6.9k
  • Earth-Surface Processes 1.8k
  • Applied Mathematics 2.1k
  • Oceanography 2.1k
Replace Journal of Applied Mathematics and Mechanics with:
Journal of Applied Mathematics and Mechanics Russia
The Quarterly Journal of Mechanics and Applied Mathematics United Kingdom
Journal of Engineering Mathematics United Kingdom
Science China Technological Sciences China
Meccanica Italy
Canadian Journal of Physics Canada
AIP Advances China
Quarterly of Applied Mathematics United States
Engineering Analysis with Boundary Elements China
Applied Mathematics and Mechanics China
Journal of Applied Mechanics and Technical Physics relative to Journal of Applied Mathematics and Mechanics Russia Journal of Applied Mathematics and Mechanics's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2×2.4×
Journal of Applied Mathematics and Mechanics · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Journal of Applied Mechanics and Technical Physics

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Applied Mechanics and Technical Physics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Applied Mechanics and Technical Physics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Applied Mechanics and Technical Physics more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Journal of Applied Mechanics and Technical Physics

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Applied Mechanics and Technical Physics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Applied Mechanics and Technical Physics.

About Journal of Applied Mechanics and Technical Physics

The 6.1k papers published in Journal of Applied Mechanics and Technical Physics in the last decades have received a total of 28.1k indexed citations . Papers published in Journal of Applied Mechanics and Technical Physics usually cover Computational Mechanics (2.0k papers), General Materials Science (241 papers), Mechanics of Materials (1.9k papers), Applied Mathematics (563 papers) and Ocean Engineering (616 papers) specifically the topics of Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows (819 papers), Geotechnical and Geomechanical Engineering (638 papers), Elasticity and Wave Propagation (590 papers), Gas Dynamics and Kinetic Theory (458 papers), Computational Fluid Dynamics and Aerodynamics (419 papers), Particle Dynamics in Fluid Flows (394 papers), Material Properties and Failure Mechanisms (345 papers) and High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior (318 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of Applied Mechanics and Technical Physics are Vladimir Evgen'evich Zakharov, V. F. Nesterenko, Vladislav Vasilievich Pukhnachev, V. K. Kedrinskiĭ, Vladimir M. Teshukov, Izolda V. Sturova, G. I. Kanel, O. V. Voinov, Vasily M. Fomin and А. В. Федоров.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact