Journal of Engineering Mathematics

2.5k papers and 33.6k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.5k papers published in Journal of Engineering Mathematics in the last decades have received a total of 33.6k indexed citations. Papers published in Journal of Engineering Mathematics usually cover Computational Mechanics (1.1k papers), Mechanics of Materials (555 papers) and Biomedical Engineering (429 papers) specifically the topics of Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows (396 papers), Fluid Dynamics and Vibration Analysis (192 papers) and Fluid Dynamics and Thin Films (184 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of Engineering Mathematics are J. H. Merkin, Lawrence K. Forbes, C. Pozrikidis, J. N. Newman, J. R. Blake, A.A. Korobkin, Allen T. Chwang, John R. King, S. D. R. Wilson and Francis Noblesse.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Journal of Engineering Mathematics

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Engineering Mathematics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Engineering Mathematics.

Countries where authors publish in Journal of Engineering Mathematics

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Engineering Mathematics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Engineering Mathematics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Engineering Mathematics more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025