Physical review. B.

45.1k papers and 691.0k indexed citations i.

About

The 45.1k papers published in Physical review. B. in the last decades have received a total of 691.0k indexed citations. Papers published in Physical review. B. usually cover Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (29.0k papers), Condensed Matter Physics (20.1k papers) and Materials Chemistry (15.8k papers) specifically the topics of Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (11.7k papers), Topological Materials and Phenomena (11.0k papers) and Quantum and electron transport phenomena (10.8k papers). The most active scholars publishing in Physical review. B. are Motohiko Ezawa, S. Das Sarma, Taylor L. Hughes, B. Andrei Bernevig, Liang Fu, Michael Pretko, Satoru Hayami, Rahul Nandkishore, Mikito Koshino and Ashvin Vishwanath.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Physical review. B.

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Physical review. B.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Physical review. B..

Countries where authors publish in Physical review. B.

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Physical review. B.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Physical review. B. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Physical review. B. more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025