Pharmaceutical Medicine

416 papers and 3.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 416 papers published in Pharmaceutical Medicine in the last decades have received a total of 3.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Pharmaceutical Medicine usually cover Economics and Econometrics (170 papers), Toxicology (92 papers) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (80 papers) specifically the topics of Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy (113 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (104 papers) and Pharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug Reactions (85 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Pharmaceutical Medicine are Shubham Atal, Amit Dang, Cheryl L. Barton, David C. Swinney, Tathagata Dutta, Sivakumar Ramachandran, Takeshi Suda, Gerhard Nahler, Kenya Kamimura and Guisheng Zhang.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Pharmaceutical Medicine

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Pharmaceutical Medicine. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Pharmaceutical Medicine.

Countries where authors publish in Pharmaceutical Medicine

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Pharmaceutical Medicine. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Pharmaceutical Medicine with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Pharmaceutical Medicine more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025