Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology

5.7k papers and 131.3k indexed citations i.

About

The 5.7k papers published in Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology in the last decades have received a total of 131.3k indexed citations. Papers published in Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology usually cover Plant Science (3.1k papers), Molecular Biology (2.4k papers) and Insect Science (2.2k papers) specifically the topics of Insect and Pesticide Research (1.6k papers), Insect Resistance and Genetics (1.2k papers) and Insect Pest Control Strategies (994 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology are John E. Casida, S.J. Yu, Ralf Nauen, E. Y. Spencer, Thomas C. Sparks, Jeffrey G. Scott, A. L. Devonshire, Vincent L. Salgado, J. Marshall Clark and G. D. Moores.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology.

Countries where authors publish in Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025