European Urology Open Science

1.0k papers and 3.4k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.0k papers published in European Urology Open Science in the last decades have received a total of 3.4k indexed citations. Papers published in European Urology Open Science usually cover Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (558 papers), Surgery (391 papers) and Urology (188 papers) specifically the topics of Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (290 papers), Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research (231 papers) and Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments (202 papers). The most active scholars publishing in European Urology Open Science are Olivier Traxer, Mariela Corrales, Alba Sierra, Obi Ekwenna, Ahmed El‐Zawahry, Puneet Sindhwani, Veeru Kasivisvanathan, Dmitry Enikeev, Steeve Doizi and Caroline M. Moore.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in European Urology Open Science

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in European Urology Open Science. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in European Urology Open Science.

Countries where authors publish in European Urology Open Science

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in European Urology Open Science. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in European Urology Open Science with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites European Urology Open Science more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025