Orthopaedic Surgery

2.3k papers and 16.7k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.3k papers published in Orthopaedic Surgery in the last decades have received a total of 16.7k indexed citations. Papers published in Orthopaedic Surgery usually cover Surgery (1.8k papers), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (594 papers) and Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (344 papers) specifically the topics of Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (567 papers), Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques (477 papers) and Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty (431 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Orthopaedic Surgery are Ralph J. Mobbs, Yong‐cheng Hu, Prashanth J. Rao, Jiayong Liu, Dengxing Lun, Kevin Phan, Nabil A. Ebraheim, William R. Walsh, Yeshuo Ma and Matthew H. Pelletier.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Orthopaedic Surgery

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Orthopaedic Surgery. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Orthopaedic Surgery.

Countries where authors publish in Orthopaedic Surgery

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Orthopaedic Surgery. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Orthopaedic Surgery with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Orthopaedic Surgery more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025