Orthopaedic Nursing

1.8k papers and 21.5k indexed citations
i
.

About

The 1.8k papers published in Orthopaedic Nursing in the last decades have received a total of 21.5k indexed citations. Papers published in Orthopaedic Nursing usually cover Surgery (667 papers), General Health Professions (274 papers) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (194 papers) specifically the topics of Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes (132 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (128 papers) and Hip and Femur Fractures (126 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Orthopaedic Nursing are Frank C. Arnett, Susan Salmond, Carolyn Crane Cutilli, Judith A. Erlen, Mary Atkinson Smith, Ian M. Bennett, Mercedes Echevarria, Carol A. Sedlak, Margaret O. Doheny and Brenda Luther.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Orthopaedic Nursing

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Orthopaedic Nursing. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Orthopaedic Nursing.

Countries where authors publish in Orthopaedic Nursing

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Orthopaedic Nursing. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Orthopaedic Nursing with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Orthopaedic Nursing more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026