Oncology and Therapy

237 papers and 1.9k indexed citations i.

About

The 237 papers published in Oncology and Therapy in the last decades have received a total of 1.9k indexed citations. Papers published in Oncology and Therapy usually cover Oncology (139 papers), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (82 papers) and Molecular Biology (41 papers) specifically the topics of Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations (30 papers), Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers (21 papers) and Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (17 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Oncology and Therapy are Peter Schmid, Mark R. Nathan, Xavier Thomas, Christopher R. Heery, Kwok‐Leung Cheung, Idan Cohen, Khaled Khazim, Raphael E. Pollock, John H. Howard and Adouda Adjiri.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Oncology and Therapy

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Oncology and Therapy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Oncology and Therapy.

Countries where authors publish in Oncology and Therapy

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Oncology and Therapy. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Oncology and Therapy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Oncology and Therapy more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025