Countries where authors publish in Nuclear Data Sheets
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Nuclear Data Sheets. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Nuclear Data Sheets with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nuclear Data Sheets more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Nuclear Data Sheets. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Nuclear Data Sheets.
About Nuclear Data Sheets
The 1.5k papers published in Nuclear Data Sheets in the last decades have received a total of 45.7k indexed citations . Papers published in Nuclear Data Sheets usually cover Radiation (1.0k papers), Nuclear and High Energy Physics (1.2k papers), Aerospace Engineering (455 papers), Materials Chemistry (191 papers) and Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (18 papers) specifically the topics of Nuclear physics research studies (1.2k papers), Nuclear Physics and Applications (962 papers), Astronomical and nuclear sciences (504 papers), Nuclear reactor physics and engineering (447 papers), Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions (283 papers), Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (257 papers), Nuclear Materials and Properties (129 papers) and Radioactive Decay and Measurement Techniques (79 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Nuclear Data Sheets are Balraj Singh, Coral M. Baglin, E. G. Browne, J.K. Tuli, J. Blachot, M.R. Schmorak, R.L. Auble, M.J. Martin, L.K. Peker and Thomas W. Burrows.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.