North American Archaeologist

535 papers and 3.0k indexed citations i.

About

The 535 papers published in North American Archaeologist in the last decades have received a total of 3.0k indexed citations. Papers published in North American Archaeologist usually cover Anthropology (396 papers), Paleontology (381 papers) and Archeology (97 papers) specifically the topics of Archaeology and ancient environmental studies (378 papers), Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology (217 papers) and Historical and Cultural Archaeology Studies (144 papers). The most active scholars publishing in North American Archaeologist are Michael Shott, John H. Blitz, Bryan Hockett, David J. Hally, Andrew P. Bradbury, Albert C. Goodyear, Kenneth B. Tankersley, William Andrefsky, Jay F. Custer and Lynn Ceci.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in North American Archaeologist

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in North American Archaeologist. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in North American Archaeologist.

Countries where authors publish in North American Archaeologist

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in North American Archaeologist. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in North American Archaeologist with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites North American Archaeologist more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025