Nursing and Midwifery Studies

367 papers and 3.0k indexed citations i.

About

The 367 papers published in Nursing and Midwifery Studies in the last decades have received a total of 3.0k indexed citations. Papers published in Nursing and Midwifery Studies usually cover Clinical Psychology (96 papers), General Health Professions (95 papers) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (77 papers) specifically the topics of Health and Well-being Studies (44 papers), Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout (25 papers) and Innovations in Medical Education (20 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Nursing and Midwifery Studies are Mohsen Adib‐Hajbaghery, Ismail Azizi-Fini, Negin Masoudi Alavi, Fatemeh Zargar, Zohreh Sadat, Anne Wilson, Masoumeh Abedzadeh‐Kalahroudi, Mohammad Aghajani, Reza Negarandeh and Abdollah Omidi.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Nursing and Midwifery Studies

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Nursing and Midwifery Studies. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Nursing and Midwifery Studies.

Countries where authors publish in Nursing and Midwifery Studies

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Nursing and Midwifery Studies. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Nursing and Midwifery Studies with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nursing and Midwifery Studies more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025