Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions

8.5k citations
497 papers · · active since 1950

Impact in

Papers in

Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions

316 papers receiving 6.9k citations

Peers

Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions
Comparison fields: 5 of 200
  • Health Informatics 759
  • Family Practice 233
  • Leadership and Management 97
  • Human-Computer Interaction 445
  • Research and Theory 57
Replace Perspectives on Medical Education with:
Perspectives on Medical Education United States
Research Synthesis Methods United Kingdom
Biochemia Medica Croatia
Journal of Chiropractic Medicine United States
International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare Australia
Active Learning in Higher Education United Kingdom
International Journal of Medical Education United States
JMIR Medical Education United States
Healthcare Informatics Research South Korea
JMIR Serious Games United States
Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions relative to Perspectives on Medical Education United States Perspectives on Medical Education's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.7×
Perspectives on Medical Education · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions.

About Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions

The 497 papers published in Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions in the last decades have received a total of 8.5k indexed citations . Papers published in Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions usually cover Leadership and Management (24 papers), Health Informatics (20 papers), Family Practice (24 papers), General Dentistry (9 papers) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (135 papers) specifically the topics of Innovations in Medical Education (106 papers), Medical Education and Admissions (27 papers), Problem and Project Based Learning (24 papers), Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills (24 papers), Healthcare Education and Workforce Issues (24 papers), Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare (22 papers), Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education (20 papers) and Empathy and Medical Education (19 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions are Hyun Kang, Sun Huh, Matt Vassar, H C G Matthew, Bokyung Kye, Eunji Kim, Yeonjeong Park, César Orsini, Sara Kim and Boaz Shulruf.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact