Natural Language Engineering

22.8k citations
708 papers · · active since 1995

Impact in

    • Natural Language Processing Techniques
    • Topic Modeling
    • Speech and dialogue systems
    • Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
    • Semantic Web and Ontologies
    • Advanced Text Analysis Techniques
    • Information Retrieval and Search Behavior

Papers in

    • Natural Language Processing Techniques 465
    • Topic Modeling 140
    • Speech and dialogue systems 58
    • Advanced Text Analysis Techniques 44
    • Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining 35
    • Speech Recognition and Synthesis 25
    • Authorship Attribution and Profiling 19

Natural Language Engineering

689 papers receiving 20.5k citations

Peers

Natural Language Engineering
Comparison fields: 5 of 161
  • Artificial Intelligence 17.2k
  • Information Systems 2.6k
  • Language and Linguistics 1.3k
  • Health Informatics 172
  • General Social Sciences 256
Replace Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics with:
Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics United States
Cognitive Systems Research United States
Minds and Machines United States
The Knowledge Engineering Review United Kingdom
Journal of Web Semantics Germany
Semantic Web Germany
Advances in computers United States
Künstliche Intell. Germany
International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education United States
Information Retrieval United States
Natural Language Engineering relative to Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics United States Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Natural Language Engineering

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Natural Language Engineering. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Natural Language Engineering with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Natural Language Engineering more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Natural Language Engineering

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Natural Language Engineering. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Natural Language Engineering.

About Natural Language Engineering

The 708 papers published in Natural Language Engineering in the last decades have received a total of 22.8k indexed citations . Papers published in Natural Language Engineering usually cover Artificial Intelligence (651 papers), Computational Mathematics (1 paper), Information Systems (33 papers), Language and Linguistics (17 papers) and Occupational Therapy (5 papers) specifically the topics of Natural Language Processing Techniques (465 papers), Topic Modeling (140 papers), Speech and dialogue systems (58 papers), Advanced Text Analysis Techniques (44 papers), Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining (35 papers), Speech Recognition and Synthesis (25 papers), Information Retrieval and Search Behavior (21 papers) and Authorship Attribution and Profiling (19 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Natural Language Engineering are Robert Dale, Kenneth Church, Dekang Lin, Adam Lally, Steven P. Abney, David A. Ferrucci, John S. Justeson, Ehud Reiter, Dan Flickinger and Patrick Pantel.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact