This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Nanocomposites. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Nanocomposites with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nanocomposites more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Nanocomposites. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Nanocomposites.
About Nanocomposites
The 202 papers published in Nanocomposites in the last decades have received a total of 3.7k indexed citations . Papers published in Nanocomposites usually cover Biomaterials (56 papers), Polymers and Plastics (56 papers), Materials Chemistry (75 papers), Biomedical Engineering (68 papers) and Surfaces, Coatings and Films (10 papers) specifically the topics of Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials (23 papers), Polymer Nanocomposites and Properties (23 papers), Carbon Nanotubes in Composites (20 papers), Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications (19 papers), biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties (19 papers), Graphene and Nanomaterials Applications (17 papers), Polymer crystallization and properties (16 papers) and Graphene research and applications (16 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Nanocomposites are Ton Peijs, N.B. Singh, S.K. Shukla, Emiliano Bilotti, Han Zhang, Seeram Ramakrishna, Merum Sireesha, Ali S. Kiran, Veluru Jagadeesh Babu and H. M. Khater.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.