Molecular Simulation

3.5k papers and 54.0k indexed citations i.

About

The 3.5k papers published in Molecular Simulation in the last decades have received a total of 54.0k indexed citations. Papers published in Molecular Simulation usually cover Materials Chemistry (1.5k papers), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (819 papers) and Biomedical Engineering (811 papers) specifically the topics of Phase Equilibria and Thermodynamics (458 papers), Material Dynamics and Properties (416 papers) and Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies (412 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Molecular Simulation are Julian D. Gale, Andrew L. Rohl, Wilfred F. van Gunsteren, R L McGreevy, László Pusztai, David Dubbeldam, Randall Q. Snurr, H. J. C. Berendsen, David Fincham and Sofı́a Calero.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Molecular Simulation

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Molecular Simulation. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Molecular Simulation.

Countries where authors publish in Molecular Simulation

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Molecular Simulation. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Molecular Simulation with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Molecular Simulation more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025