Meteoritics and Planetary Science

5.6k papers and 101.7k indexed citations i.

About

The 5.6k papers published in Meteoritics and Planetary Science in the last decades have received a total of 101.7k indexed citations. Papers published in Meteoritics and Planetary Science usually cover Astronomy and Astrophysics (4.5k papers), Geophysics (1.9k papers) and Atmospheric Science (1.1k papers) specifically the topics of Astro and Planetary Science (4.1k papers), Planetary Science and Exploration (3.1k papers) and Geological and Geochemical Analysis (1.2k papers). The most active scholars publishing in Meteoritics and Planetary Science are Alan E. Rubin, H. Y. McSween, J. N. Grossman, Alexander N. Krot, M. E. Zolensky, Christian Koeberl, H. J. Melosh, C. M. Pieters, C. M. O'd. Alexander and D. Stöffler.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Meteoritics and Planetary Science

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Meteoritics and Planetary Science. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Meteoritics and Planetary Science.

Countries where authors publish in Meteoritics and Planetary Science

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Meteoritics and Planetary Science. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Meteoritics and Planetary Science with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Meteoritics and Planetary Science more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025