Mental Health Religion & Culture

1.4k papers and 17.5k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.4k papers published in Mental Health Religion & Culture in the last decades have received a total of 17.5k indexed citations. Papers published in Mental Health Religion & Culture usually cover Health (1.1k papers), Clinical Psychology (608 papers) and Social Psychology (590 papers) specifically the topics of Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (1.0k papers), Religion and Society Interactions (241 papers) and Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health (233 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Mental Health Religion & Culture are Leslie J. Francis, Ahmed M. Abdel‐Khalek, Christopher Alan Lewis, Stephen Joseph, Kenneth I. Pargäment, Mandy Robbins, Vassilis Saroglou, Bart Duriez, Adam Okulicz‐Kozaryn and Neal Krause.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Mental Health Religion & Culture

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Mental Health Religion & Culture. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Mental Health Religion & Culture.

Countries where authors publish in Mental Health Religion & Culture

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Mental Health Religion & Culture. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Mental Health Religion & Culture with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mental Health Religion & Culture more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025