Medical Law International

277 papers and 1.1k indexed citations i.

About

The 277 papers published in Medical Law International in the last decades have received a total of 1.1k indexed citations. Papers published in Medical Law International usually cover Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (116 papers), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (77 papers) and General Health Professions (67 papers) specifically the topics of Ethical Considerations in Pediatric Medical Decision-Making (73 papers), Patient Dignity and Privacy (49 papers) and Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues (45 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Medical Law International are Nicola Glover‐Thomas, Timothy Caulfield, Jane Kaye, Graeme Laurie, Helen Smith, Andrew Grubb, Deryck Beyleveld, Charles Ngwena, Mark Eccleston-Turner and Jonathan Herring.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Medical Law International

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Medical Law International. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Medical Law International.

Countries where authors publish in Medical Law International

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Medical Law International. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Medical Law International with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Medical Law International more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025