Lithic Technology

585 papers and 5.5k indexed citations i.

About

The 585 papers published in Lithic Technology in the last decades have received a total of 5.5k indexed citations. Papers published in Lithic Technology usually cover Anthropology (348 papers), Paleontology (337 papers) and Archeology (175 papers) specifically the topics of Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology (326 papers), Archaeology and ancient environmental studies (320 papers) and Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies (84 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Lithic Technology are Michael Shott, Brian Hayden, Metin I. Eren, C. Britt Bousman, Stephen J. Lycett, Frédéric Sellet, Harold L. Dibble, Grant McCall, John E. Clark and Daniel S. Amick.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Lithic Technology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Lithic Technology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Lithic Technology.

Countries where authors publish in Lithic Technology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Lithic Technology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Lithic Technology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lithic Technology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025