Countries where authors publish in Leisure Sciences
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Leisure Sciences. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Leisure Sciences with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Leisure Sciences more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Leisure Sciences. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Leisure Sciences.
About Leisure Sciences
The 1.5k papers published in Leisure Sciences in the last decades have received a total of 55.8k indexed citations . Papers published in Leisure Sciences usually cover Social Psychology (1.0k papers), Gender Studies (207 papers), Sociology and Political Science (911 papers), Transportation (139 papers) and Applied Psychology (81 papers) specifically the topics of Recreation, Leisure, Wilderness Management (913 papers), Sport and Mega-Event Impacts (434 papers), Diverse Aspects of Tourism Research (336 papers), Adventure Sports and Sensation Seeking (189 papers), Urban Green Space and Health (174 papers), Economic and Environmental Valuation (172 papers), Sports, Gender, and Society (142 papers) and Urban Transport and Accessibility (124 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Leisure Sciences are Edgar L. Jackson, Geoffrey Godbey, Duane W. Crawford, Karla A. Henderson, Jerry J. Vaske, Susan Shaw, David Scott, Troy D. Glover, Kelly S. Bricker and Icek Ajzen.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.