Language and Cognition

415 papers and 3.8k indexed citations i.

About

The 415 papers published in Language and Cognition in the last decades have received a total of 3.8k indexed citations. Papers published in Language and Cognition usually cover Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (282 papers), Language and Linguistics (156 papers) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (147 papers) specifically the topics of Language, Metaphor, and Cognition (240 papers), Categorization, perception, and language (95 papers) and Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies (78 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Language and Cognition are Anjan Chatterjee, Gabriella Vigliocco, Jean M. Mandler, Stavroula Kousta, Mark Andrews, Lotte Meteyard, Tessa Verhoef, Teenie Matlock, Adele Ε. Goldberg and Andrew Wedel.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Language and Cognition

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Language and Cognition. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Language and Cognition.

Countries where authors publish in Language and Cognition

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Language and Cognition. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Language and Cognition with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Language and Cognition more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025