Kinesiology Review

481 papers and 3.6k indexed citations

About

The 481 papers published in Kinesiology Review in the last decades have received a total of 3.6k indexed citations. Papers published in Kinesiology Review usually cover Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation (202 papers), Sociology and Political Science (157 papers) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (115 papers) specifically the topics of Physical Education and Pedagogy (185 papers), Inclusion and Disability in Education and Sport (96 papers) and Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports (73 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Kinesiology Review are K. Andrew R. Richards, Leah E. Robinson, Wojtek Chodzko-Zajko, Kim C. Graber, Thomas J. Templin, Karin A. Pfeiffer, Daniel Gould, E. Kipling Webster, Nancy Getchell and Samuel W. Logan.

In The Last Decade

Kinesiology Review

392 papers receiving 3.3k citations

Fields of papers published in Kinesiology Review

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Kinesiology Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Kinesiology Review.

Countries where authors publish in Kinesiology Review

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Kinesiology Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Kinesiology Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kinesiology Review more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026