Transactions of the Royal Society of South Africa · 1×
×1.74k/3kNLC
×1.57k/5kECOLO
×2.41k/434EM
×2.9657/223FORES
×0.9165/188ARCHE
Citations per year
'16
'17
'18
'19
'20
'21
'22
'23
'24
'25
'26
Countries where authors publish in Koedoe
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Koedoe. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Koedoe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Koedoe more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Koedoe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Koedoe.
About Koedoe
The 1.1k papers published in Koedoe in the last decades have received a total of 13.3k indexed citations . Papers published in Koedoe usually cover Archeology (40 papers), Nature and Landscape Conservation (368 papers), Ecology (497 papers), Ecological Modeling (72 papers) and Forestry (61 papers) specifically the topics of Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (300 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (282 papers), Botany and Plant Ecology Studies (133 papers), Ecology and biodiversity studies (89 papers), Rangeland Management and Livestock Ecology (72 papers), Species Distribution and Climate Change (72 papers), Fish Ecology and Management Studies (59 papers) and Rangeland and Wildlife Management (51 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Koedoe are U. De V. Pienaar, W. P. D Gertenbach, M. G. L. Mills, Jacobus du P. Bothma, Harry Biggs, Hugo Bezuidenhout, Melville Saayman, G.L. Smuts, George J. Bredenkamp and Llewellyn C. Foxcroft.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.