ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data

36.1k citations
1.2k papers · · active since 2007

Impact in

Papers in

ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data

1.1k papers receiving 34.9k citations

Peers

ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data
Comparison fields: 5 of 209
  • Computational Mathematics 425
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 5.2k
  • Artificial Intelligence 15.3k
  • Information Systems 5.9k
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 3.6k
Replace Statistics and Computing with:
Statistics and Computing United Kingdom
Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics United States
ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software United States
IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems China
Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery United States
ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology China
IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica China
IEEE Transactions on Big Data China
Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering India
Journal of Algorithms United States
ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data relative to Statistics and Computing United Kingdom Statistics and Computing's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3.1×
Statistics and Computing · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data more than expected).

Fields of papers published in ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data.

About ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data

The 1.2k papers published in ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data in the last decades have received a total of 36.1k indexed citations . Papers published in ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data usually cover Computational Mathematics (23 papers), Artificial Intelligence (587 papers), Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (165 papers), Information Systems (253 papers) and Signal Processing (65 papers) specifically the topics of Complex Network Analysis Techniques (164 papers), Advanced Graph Neural Networks (158 papers), Recommender Systems and Techniques (127 papers), Advanced Clustering Algorithms Research (85 papers), Data Mining Algorithms and Applications (77 papers), Graph Theory and Algorithms (74 papers), Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications (56 papers) and Topic Modeling (52 papers). The most active scholars publishing in ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data are Jure Leskovec, Christos Faloutsos, Zhi‐Hua Zhou, Daniel Kifer, Ashwin Machanavajjhala, Johannes E. Gehrke, Muthuramakrishnan Venkitasubramaniam, Jon M. Kleinberg, Yehuda Koren and Fei Tony Liu.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact