Boletín de filología

361 papers and 617 indexed citations i.

About

The 361 papers published in Boletín de filología in the last decades have received a total of 617 indexed citations. Papers published in Boletín de filología usually cover Language and Linguistics (281 papers), Linguistics and Language (105 papers) and Artificial Intelligence (62 papers) specifically the topics of Spanish Linguistics and Language Studies (277 papers), Historical Linguistics and Language Studies (91 papers) and Cultural and political discourse analysis (61 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Boletín de filología are Ana María Cestero Mancera, José del Valle, Luis Prieto, Anita Ferreira Cabrera, Francisco Moreno Fernández, Ignacio Bosque, Isabel Molina Martos, Juan Andrés Villena Ponsoda, Antonio Quilis and Manuel Díaz‐Campos.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Boletín de filología

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Boletín de filología. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Boletín de filología.

Countries where authors publish in Boletín de filología

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Boletín de filología. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Boletín de filología with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Boletín de filología more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025