Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering

18.5k citations
837 papers · · active since 1950

Impact in

Papers in

Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering

797 papers receiving 16.3k citations

Peers

Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering
Comparison fields: 5 of 173
  • Medical Laboratory Technology 3.3k
  • Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality 7.3k
  • Management Information Systems 5.7k
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 2.6k
  • Software 1.2k
Replace Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management with:
Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management United Kingdom
Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part O Journal of Risk and Reliability China
Journal Of Big Data United States
IISE Transactions United States
The TQM Journal India
Cognition Technology & Work United Kingdom
Annual Reviews in Control United States
Quality Technology & Quantitative Management China
Engineering Management Journal United States
IMA Journal of Management Mathematics United Kingdom
Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering relative to Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management United Kingdom Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×20.3×
Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering.

About Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering

The 837 papers published in Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering in the last decades have received a total of 18.5k indexed citations . Papers published in Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering usually cover Medical Laboratory Technology (157 papers), Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality (456 papers), Management Information Systems (241 papers), Software (96 papers) and Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (139 papers) specifically the topics of Reliability and Maintenance Optimization (436 papers), Quality and Supply Management (190 papers), Quality and Safety in Healthcare (157 papers), Life Cycle Costing Analysis (141 papers), Risk and Safety Analysis (96 papers), Software Reliability and Analysis Research (96 papers), Management and Optimization Techniques (79 papers) and Statistical Distribution Estimation and Applications (62 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering are Albert Tsang, Ashraf Labib, Aditya Parida, D. J. Sherwin, S.G. Deshmukh, Mohamed Ben‐Daya, Salih O. Duffuaa, Uday Kumar, Uday Kumar and Basim Al‐Najjar.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact