Journal of Social Work Practice

876 papers and 7.8k indexed citations i.

About

The 876 papers published in Journal of Social Work Practice in the last decades have received a total of 7.8k indexed citations. Papers published in Journal of Social Work Practice usually cover Clinical Psychology (472 papers), Public Administration (311 papers) and General Health Professions (286 papers) specifically the topics of Social Work Education and Practice (310 papers), Counseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics (176 papers) and Patient and Public Engagement in Healthcare Research (126 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of Social Work Practice are Johnson Chun-Sing Cheung, Pamela Trevithick, Caroline Hickman, David Howe, Gillian Ruch, Simon Biggs, Martin Smith, Wendy Hollway, Liliana Sousa and Stephen Briggs.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Journal of Social Work Practice

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Social Work Practice. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Social Work Practice.

Countries where authors publish in Journal of Social Work Practice

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Social Work Practice. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Social Work Practice with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Social Work Practice more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025